iCONECT vs Onna
| iCONECT | Onna | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | — | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | api, self-hosted, Web | api, self-hosted, Web |
| Supported data sources | email, chat, text, native files, preprocessed data | Slack, Microsoft Teams, Outlook, Google Workspace, Zoom, Box, Dropbox, OneDrive, SharePoint, Amazon S3, Jira, Confluence, Salesforce, Zendesk, GitHub, Miro, Quip, custom internal systems, unsupported SaaS applications |
| Native file viewer | Yes | — |
| Email threading | Yes | — |
| Automated redaction | Yes | — |
| Production formats | native files, images, PDF | — |
| Deployment | — | vendor cloud |
Both are listed in Best Legal eDiscovery Software, Best eDiscovery Software. On Samsung Mobile US Press, iCONECT scores higher on our published basis.