Eclipse RDF4J vs qEndpoint
| Eclipse RDF4J | qEndpoint | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | Free | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | api, Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Web, Windows | api, Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Web, Windows |
| Deployment options | self-hosted | self-hosted |
| SPARQL support | sparql 1.2 | sparql 1.1 |
| Reasoning support | Yes | — |
| RDF-star support | Yes | — |
| Federated queries | Yes | — |
| Supported RDF formats | RDF/XML, Turtle, N-Triples, N-Quads, JSON-LD, TriG, TriX | RDF/XML, Turtle, N-Triples, N-Quads, JSON-LD, TriG, TriX |
Both are listed in Best RDF Databases. On Samsung Mobile US Press, Eclipse RDF4J scores higher on our published basis.