MedHub

MedHub provides medical education management software for undergraduate medical education and graduate residency programs. Its UME tools cover student and schedule management, curriculum mapping, competency tracking, evaluations, accreditation maintenance, and reporting. For GME programs, the platform supports residency scheduling, evaluations, resident onboarding, accreditation management, and reimbursement optimization. A curriculum and assessment solution includes board exam readiness tools, performance analytics, and AI risk assessment. The mobile app supports evaluations, work hours, calendars, procedure logs, reminders, talk-to-text, and offline task syncing. Listed interfaces and integrations include AAMC ERAS, ACGME, NPDB, NPPES, PeopleSoft, Epic, Oracle, Comet LMS, Qgenda, and Kronos. An API offers predefined calls, with access requested through an institution’s GME office. MedHub lists 128-bit SSL encryption, optional multifactor authentication, FERPA and SOC 2 compliance, and 99.95% uptime. Pricing is on request, and the site invites institutions to request a demo. Users can submit support tickets through their institution’s MedHub URL.

MedHub combines program administration, mobile workflows, assessment, and integrations for medical education institutions. Organizations should request pricing and confirm API access through their GME office.

MedHub suits medical schools and residency programs seeking software for education administration, scheduling, assessment, and accreditation work. Its mobile app may also suit learners and staff who need to manage evaluations, logs, calendars, or work hours on the go.

MedHub is an education-management platform for medical schools and residency programs. It is best suited to institutions that want curriculum, assessment, and residency administration in one system. Its broad scope is a meaningful advantage, though custom pricing and institution-managed API access make it a coordinated institutional purchase.

Overview

MedHub serves undergraduate medical education (UME) and graduate medical education (GME), combining student and curriculum workflows with residency operations. That reach matters for institutions managing both sides of medical education; teams that need only a rota tool may find its broader remit unnecessary.

For UME, the platform covers student and schedule management, reporting, curriculum mapping, competency tracking, evaluations, and accreditation maintenance. GME tools address residency operations, including schedules, onboarding, evaluations, accreditation management, and reimbursement optimization. Rotation scheduling, call scheduling, and conflict checks make scheduling part of the package rather than its sole purpose.

Key features

Curriculum and assessment

MedHub’s curriculum and assessment solution includes board-exam readiness tools, performance analytics, and AI risk assessment. These capabilities extend the platform into learner progress and assessment, which can make it a better fit for institutions seeking more than administrative scheduling.

Mobile workflows and integrations

The iOS and Android app supports evaluations, work hours, calendars, procedure logs, reminders, talk-to-text, and offline task syncing. That range supports work away from a desktop, while offline syncing is useful when tasks cannot be completed online in the moment.

MedHub lists interfaces with AAMC ERAS, ACGME, NPDB, NPPES, PeopleSoft, Epic, Oracle, Comet LMS, Qgenda, and Kronos. Its SAML and Shibboleth single sign-on support can fit institutional identity systems; MedHub says more than half of its clients provide users with SSO access. The API offers predefined calls for external systems, but institutions manage access through their GME office, so teams should account for that approval path when planning integrations.

Security, reliability, and support

MedHub states that it uses 128-bit SSL encryption, offers multifactor authentication, and complies with FERPA and SOC 2. It also reports 99.95% uptime across continuous operations. Its security protocols include encrypted client-data transfers, incremental backups at least daily, weekly full backups, and a documented continuity plan. These are relevant safeguards for institutions handling education workflows, though they do not replace an institution’s own security review.

Support is available through tickets submitted via an institution’s MedHub URL and by phone at 866.766.0625, extension 1. Live and on-demand training, a Learning Portal, training series, and strategic advisory services give institutions options for onboarding and ongoing guidance.

Pricing

MedHub uses a paid model with custom pricing. It invites institutions to request a demo, but does not offer public plan prices or published seat, quota, trial, or renewal terms. This suits buyers evaluating an institution-wide platform, but makes it harder to compare costs before contacting sales. Institutions should request a quote that reflects their UME and GME scope and confirm API access requirements with their GME office.

Platforms

MedHub supports web, iOS, Android, and API access. Its mobile app is distributed through the Apple App Store and Google Play. Both mobile and desktop access serve users moving between administrative work and clinical or educational tasks.

Who it's for

MedHub is a strong fit for medical schools and residency programs that need curriculum mapping, assessment, accreditation work, and resident administration alongside scheduling. Institutions with both UME and GME operations may benefit most from its breadth. A team seeking only schedule creation, or one that cannot coordinate custom procurement and API access internally, should consider a more focused alternative.

Pros and cons

Pros

• Broad UME and GME coverage: Curriculum, assessment, accreditation, onboarding, and reimbursement optimization extend beyond basic scheduling.
• Useful mobile workflows: Evaluations, logs, reminders, and offline task syncing support work beyond a desktop setting.
• Institutional integration options: Named interfaces, SAML and Shibboleth SSO, and predefined API calls support connection to other systems.
• Defined security and continuity measures: The stated encryption, compliance, uptime, backup, and continuity provisions give institutional buyers concrete points for review.

Cons

• Custom pricing: Without public prices or plan terms, buyers need a sales conversation to assess cost and compare scope.
• API access requires institutional coordination: Access is managed through the GME office, which may complicate integration planning for teams outside that office.
• May exceed a narrow scheduling need: Programs looking only for a rota function may not need the wider education-management platform.

Alternatives

For a focused comparison of scheduling products, browse Medical Residency Scheduling Software.

• TigerConnect Physician Scheduling is worth considering when an organization wants enterprise-wide physician scheduling; pricing is by sales contact and it supports a broad set of desktop and mobile platforms.
• Amion may suit a program prioritizing schedule capacity: its Pro plan covers up to 10 schedules, while Enterprise offers unlimited schedules and organization-wide settings. Both are paid plans with prices not stated.
• Equina is another paid option for buyers whose price basis should reflect what they run rather than the number of people logging in.
• Lightning Bolt may fit teams comfortable with per-seat licensing; adding scheduled individuals requires additional licenses.
• CoverED offers a bundled residency-program license at $30 a month, billed $25/mo annual, with a separate workspace, resident roles, custom rotation blocks, and per-block site assignment. Its free trial can help a program evaluate that more focused option.
• MedRez.net offers a one-program-or-specialty plan at $450 a year for one year of scheduling, with a half-year option also available; it may suit a buyer focused on that scope.
• Resident Vacation Scheduler has a free plan for self-service use by up to five residents, making it a narrower option for small programs focused on vacation scheduling.
• Aurora-Med is an alternative to consider.

Verdict

Choose MedHub if your institution needs UME and GME administration, assessment, and scheduling in a shared platform. Its broad workflow coverage and integration options are the strongest reasons to choose it; custom pricing and GME-office-managed API access are the main reasons to look elsewhere, especially for teams that need only scheduling or want a simpler purchase.