Interviewer.AI

Interviewer.AI provides AI-powered asynchronous video interviews, conversational AI avatar interviews, admissions screening, and mock interviews. Its screening tools include resume review, candidate matching, response relevancy scoring, and human review of candidates. The 14-day trial allows up to five AI interview assessments. One credit covers an asynchronous interview and its assessment report; a conversational AI interview uses two credits, and unused credits roll over month to month. Essential Edition costs $199 a month, billed monthly, and includes 50 interview credits per month, three job posts, 20-minute interviews, and 15 user licenses. Professional Edition costs $399 a month, billed monthly. The platform supports live interviews, recording, templates, and mobile access without an App Store or Google Play download. ATS integrations are available on annual Professional with a one-time customization fee and on Enterprise. Fraud checks flag signals for human review without changing candidate scores. The company says authorized employer personnel must review candidates; AI scores alone should not determine rejection.

Interviewer.AI combines several interview formats with screening tools and human review. Consider the trial limit, credit use, and plan requirements for integrations when choosing a tier.

The product is aimed at hiring teams, staffing agencies, and university admissions teams. It may suit organizations seeking asynchronous or conversational interviews alongside human review.

Interviewer.AI is a credit-based interview and screening suite for hiring teams, staffing firms, and university admissions offices. It suits organisations that need both asynchronous and conversational assessments with people retaining final decision authority. The central choice is whether its format breadth and review safeguards justify published plan caps and paid-only access.

Overview

The service combines asynchronous video interviews, conversational AI avatar interviews, live interviews, recordings, reusable templates, admissions screening, and mock interviews. That range can consolidate several assessment workflows, but usage is metered: one credit covers an asynchronous interview and its report, while an avatar interview consumes two credits.

Screening tools cover AI resume screening, candidate matching, and response-relevancy scoring. Human-in-the-loop review is built into the decision process. Fraud checks flag patterns such as multiple voices, lip-sync irregularities, or potentially AI-generated or assisted answers; these signals inform reviewers without changing candidate scores. Authorised employer personnel must review candidates, and rejection solely on an AI score is not permitted.

Transcript text is sent to OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google for evaluation, without raw video or audio, and those providers do not use API data for model training. Security controls include TLS 1.3 in transit, AES-256 at rest, mandatory administrator MFA, and an ISO/IEC 27001:2022-certified information security management system. Primary AWS hosting is in Singapore, with Frankfurt hosting for EU/EEA and UK candidate data when that regional setup is required.

Key features

Interview formats and review

Asynchronous and live interviews, recording, templates, avatar conversations, admissions screening, and mock interviews let teams standardise different stages. The credit distinction matters: conversational assessments consume twice the credits of asynchronous ones, so avatar-heavy programmes reach quotas faster.

Integrations and API

ATS connections include Workday, Greenhouse, Lever, SmartRecruiters, Bullhorn, Workable, and many others. Integrations require annual Professional service with a one-time customisation fee, or Enterprise. Enterprise also includes API access and custom connectors; the API supports invitations, scorecards, and webhooks. That makes the top tier the practical route for organisations automating a recruiting stack.

Mobile access and support

The platform works on mobile through a browser, without an App Store or Google Play download. Online chat and email support are listed for plans; Enterprise adds a dedicated account manager and dedicated setup and implementation assistance.

Pricing

Essential Edition — $199 a month

Billed monthly, Essential provides 50 interview credits each month, three job posts, interviews up to 20 minutes, and 15 total user licenses. It is the entry point for small teams with moderate volume, but three active job posts and the shorter duration limit can constrain agencies or multi-role recruiting.

Professional Edition — $399 a month

Professional raises the allowance to 120 credits, five job posts, 30-minute interviews, and 25 user licenses, billed monthly. It better fits growing hiring teams and staffing operations, especially when longer responses or more simultaneous requisitions matter. ATS integrations require annual Professional billing plus a one-time customisation fee, so the monthly price alone does not cover that integration path.

Enterprise Edition — custom pricing

Enterprise bills annually with custom interview credits, 200 job posts, and 40 or more user licenses. It is aimed at large employers, agencies, and universities needing scale, API access, custom connectors, and dedicated implementation support.

There is no free plan. The 14-day trial permits up to five AI interview assessments, and paid plans start with the trial. Unused interview credits roll over month to month, which helps uneven hiring cycles but does not remove the published quotas.

Platforms

Interviewer.AI is available on Android, iOS, web, and through an API. Candidates can use the mobile experience without installing a store app.

Who it's for

Hiring teams gain structured first-round assessment and ATS-oriented workflows; staffing agencies can reuse templates across requisitions; universities can apply admissions screening and mock-interview capabilities. It is less suitable for occasional users who need a free tier or for organisations unwilling to retain human review of AI-assisted assessments.

Pros and cons

• Pros: Multiple interview modes cover asynchronous, live, avatar, admissions, and practice scenarios.
• Pros: Credit rollover accommodates fluctuating monthly demand.
• Pros: Fraud indicators, score explanations, and mandatory human review support accountable decisions.
• Pros: Enterprise API and connector support can fit automated recruiting operations.
• Cons: No free plan, and the trial is limited to five AI assessments over 14 days.
• Cons: Avatar interviews use two credits, making mixed-format volume harder to forecast.
• Cons: Essential and Professional cap job posts, seats, interview length, and monthly credits.
• Cons: ATS integrations require annual Professional billing, customisation fees, or Enterprise.

Alternatives

Compare AI Recruiting Software and Video Interview Software lists for broader category choices. iCIMS is a paid, multi-platform option. Choose Hirin if a free plan and free trial are priorities. Curately Messaging is another paid option with mobile, web, and extension access. Paradox suits buyers seeking tailored custom pricing without a free plan. Hyring offers a free tier and a $79 monthly Pro plan. IntervueBox has a free-forever tier with one-time signup credits. Tellability provides free and paid INR plans. Pin offers a free tier focused on contact lookup and AI-agent workflows.

Verdict

Choose Interviewer.AI if your organisation needs recurring, structured video or avatar interviews, screening signals, and human-controlled decisions in one platform. Its broad formats, rollover credits, and Enterprise integration options are the strongest reasons to buy. Look elsewhere if you need a genuinely free starting point, very small-scale hiring, or predictable per-candidate costs without credit and plan caps.