Retour vs Trilio Site Recovery
| Retour | Trilio Site Recovery | |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | self-hosted, Web | api, Linux, self-hosted |
| Application consistency | both | |
| Persistent volume backup | Yes | Yes |
| Cross-cluster restore | Yes | |
| Backup frequency | scheduled | |
| Retention options | custom | |
| Immutable backups | Yes | |
| Replication mode | continuous | |
| Failover orchestration | Yes | |
| Dependency mapping | Yes | |
| Supported workloads | KubeVirt virtual machines; OpenShift Virtualization virtual machines | |
| Kubernetes support | Yes | |
| Cluster resource backup | Yes | |
| App-consistent backup | Yes | |
| Deployment model | hybrid | |
| Hypervisor coverage | OpenStack, KubeVirt, Red Hat Virtualization, KVM | |
| Application-aware backup | Yes | |
| Immutable backup storage | Yes | |
| Instant VM recovery | Yes | |
| Cloud backup target | Yes | |
| Off-site replication | Yes |
Listed together in Best Kubernetes Backup SoftwareBest Container Backup Software