Orangebeard vs Tesults
| Orangebeard | Tesults | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | — | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Web | Web, iOS, Android |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Supported frameworks | JUnit 4/5, NUnit, Selenium, Cypress, WebdriverIO, FitNesse, Robot Framework, Ranorex, Cucumber | EXP, GoogleTest, Rust #[test], nextest, rstest, JUnit 5, JUnit 4, TestNG, pytest, Robot Framework, NUnit 3, xUnit, MSTest, RSpec, Mocha, Jasmine, Jest, Playwright, WebdriverIO, CodeceptJS, Nightwatch, Vitest, Waffle, Postman, Protractor, Cypress, TestCafe, XCTest, Espresso, Selenium, ROS 2, colcon |
| CI/CD integrations | CircleCI, Travis CI, Jenkins, GitLab CI, Azure DevOps | GitHub Actions |
| Flaky-test detection | Yes | Yes |
| Failure analysis | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hosted deployment | No | — |
| Execution trend reports | — | Yes |
| Data retention | — | 90 days |
Both are listed in Best Test Analytics Software. On Samsung Mobile US Press, Tesults scores higher on our published basis.