Tesults

Tesults is a test reporting and case management service for engineering teams. It keeps automated test results together with related logs, screenshots and files, and compares runs to help teams identify regressions and tests that may be flaky. For manual QA, teams can create and manage test cases, import or export them as CSV, and assign runs to team members. Listed connections include GitHub Actions, Slack, Microsoft Teams, Mattermost, PagerDuty and Jira, alongside frameworks such as JUnit, pytest, Jest, Playwright, Cypress, Postman, GoogleTest and ROS 2. API endpoints cover run explanations, flaky-test identification and comparisons; an MCP server lets compatible AI tools query test data. A mobile app provides results and dashboards on iOS and Android, with web and API access also listed. The Free plan includes 30 days of automated result history, 100 test cases per run and 5 targets. Paid plans start at $19/user/mo (annual). Tesults is based in London and stores data in US AWS data centers.

Tesults brings automated reporting, manual case management and run analysis together, with mobile access and a range of listed integrations. The Free plan has defined run and history limits; paid plans start at $19/user/mo (annual).

Tesults suits engineering teams that need to consolidate automated test reporting with manual case management. It may also fit teams seeking mobile dashboards, integrations or tools for comparing runs and tracking potentially flaky tests.

Overview

Tesults brings automated test reporting and manual case management into one service for engineering teams. It is best suited to teams that need to compare test runs, track flaky failures and keep result artifacts close to their test data.

Its strongest case is the breadth of its reporting and workflow tools; the main trade-off is that the free tier has tight run and retention limits, while longer history requires a paid plan.

Key features

Tesults stores test results alongside logs, screenshots and other files, making it easier to keep evidence with the run it explains. Run comparisons help surface regressions, while automated flaky-test flags can help teams focus on inconsistent failures rather than treating every red result alike.

Manual QA is part of the same workflow: teams can create and manage test cases, import or export them as CSV, and assign runs to team members. That combination is useful when automated suites and human checks need to be tracked together, though the Free plan's caps make it a limited fit for larger suites.

Integrations cover GitHub Actions and team notifications through Slack, Microsoft Teams, Mattermost, PagerDuty and Jira. Framework connections span tools such as JUnit, pytest, Jest, Playwright, Cypress, Postman, GoogleTest and ROS 2. Tesults also provides API endpoints for run explanations, flaky-test identification and run comparisons, plus an MCP server for querying test data with compatible AI tools.

Mobile apps for iOS and Android provide access to results and dashboards away from a desktop. Security measures include TLS over HTTPS, encryption of authentication-related data at rest, two-factor authentication, authenticated APIs and project roles with different permissions. Data is stored in US AWS data centers; when a team requests access from outside the United States, data may be temporarily cached on global CDNs and in the browser.

Pricing

The Free plan costs nothing, billed for a lifetime, and allows unlimited users. It includes 100 test cases per run, 5 targets, 10 lists and runs, 100 test cases per list and run, one release record, one release checklist, 50GB total file storage, 100K total file uploads and 30 days of automated results history. These caps make it a practical starting point for a small project, but not a roomy long-term archive or high-volume suite.

Standard is $19.00 per active user per month if paying yearly, or $20.65 per active user per month if paying monthly. It removes the Free plan's limits on test cases, targets, lists and runs, and provides 50GB/user/month storage, 100K uploads/user/month, 90 days of results history and 12 archived runs per target. It suits teams that have outgrown the free quotas but can work within three months of history.

Plus costs $37.00 per active user per month if paying yearly, or $40.22 per active user per month if paying monthly. It includes unlimited test cases, targets, lists and runs, 100GB/user/month storage, 200K uploads/user/month, 365 days of results history and 36 archived runs per target. The longer history is the clearest reason to choose it over Standard, particularly for teams that need year-long comparisons.

Enterprise has custom pricing, with unlimited test cases, targets, lists and runs and customized storage, uploads, retention, rate limits and support. It is the fit for teams whose capacity or support requirements call for a tailored arrangement. Tesults has no free trial; the lifetime Free plan is the no-cost way to evaluate the service.

Platforms

Tesults supports web, API, iOS and Android. The mobile apps extend dashboard and results access, while the API supports programmatic run analysis and querying.

Who it's for

Tesults is a strong match for engineering teams that want test reporting, manual QA tracking, failure analysis and stored artifacts in a shared workflow. Teams with substantial history needs should budget for Plus or Enterprise; teams needing only a small run volume can start with Free. It is less compelling when a team's priority is an uncapped archive at no cost.

Pros and cons

• Pro: Automated and manual testing workflows coexist, including CSV case management and run assignment, which can reduce separation between QA and CI results.
• Pro: Run comparisons, flaky-test identification and stored logs or screenshots connect failure analysis with supporting evidence.
• Pro: Broad framework support and integrations with GitHub Actions, collaboration tools and Jira suit varied engineering workflows.
• Con: Free limits of 5 targets, 10 lists and runs, and 30 days of automated history can constrain a growing project.
• Con: Standard raises history only to 90 days; a full year requires Plus at $37.00 per active user per month if paying yearly.

Alternatives

Browse Test Analytics Software for more options. Parasoft SOAtest is worth considering for teams seeking a paid testing product with a free trial and platform support spanning desktop, mobile, API and self-hosted environments; its pricing is tailored by business needs.

TestMu AI is another freemium option with a free plan and a listed KaneAI Starter plan at $17 a month billed annually. Perfecto Test Analytics is a paid alternative for Android, iOS and web.

BrowserStack Test Reporting & Analytics may suit teams that value a free plan and a free trial; its Free Plan retains test-run history and assertion failure logs for up to 60 days, with video logs retained for 30 days and debug logs for 60 days. BuildPulse is a paid option with a free trial and a runner plan that includes 3,000 free minutes every month before per-minute pricing.

Flakiness.io offers a freemium option with web and self-hosted platforms. Mergify may be a fit for open-source projects or private teams up to five users seeking a free plan with a free trial. Qualflare has a free Starter plan covering one project, one active user, 200 test cases and 100 test reports, and a listed Core plan at $16 a month.

Verdict

Choose Tesults if your engineering team wants automated run analysis and manual case management alongside artifacts, integrations and mobile dashboard access. Its analysis breadth is the central reason to choose it; look elsewhere if the Free plan's run and history caps are too restrictive and per-user paid pricing does not fit your team.