Onna vs OpenText eDiscovery
| Onna | OpenText eDiscovery | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | — | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | api, self-hosted, Web | Web |
| Deployment | vendor cloud | vendor cloud |
| Supported data sources | Slack, Microsoft Teams, Outlook, Google Workspace, Zoom, Box, Dropbox, OneDrive, SharePoint, Amazon S3, Jira, Confluence, Salesforce, Zendesk, GitHub, Miro, Quip, custom internal systems, unsupported SaaS applications | email servers, network drives, cloud storage, local devices, Microsoft Office 365, Google, Slack |
| Native file viewer | — | Yes |
| Email threading | — | Yes |
| Automated redaction | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Legal eDiscovery Software, Best eDiscovery Software. On Samsung Mobile US Press, OpenText eDiscovery scores higher on our published basis.