Everlaw vs Onna
| Everlaw | Onna | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | — | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | api, Web | api, self-hosted, Web |
| Free plan | No | — |
| Deployment | vendor cloud | vendor cloud |
| Supported data sources | Microsoft 365, Zoom, Google Workspace, Purview, Asana, Jira, Slack, Zendesk, Salesforce, Box, Dropbox, Google Drive, SharePoint, OneDrive, ShareFile, Google Vault, native files, processed datasets | Slack, Microsoft Teams, Outlook, Google Workspace, Zoom, Box, Dropbox, OneDrive, SharePoint, Amazon S3, Jira, Confluence, Salesforce, Zendesk, GitHub, Miro, Quip, custom internal systems, unsupported SaaS applications |
| Native file viewer | Yes | — |
| Email threading | Yes | — |
| Automated redaction | Yes | — |
| Production formats | PDF, TIFF, PNG, JPEG, native files, TXT, DAT, CSV, OPT | — |
Both are listed in Best Legal eDiscovery Software, Best eDiscovery Software. On Samsung Mobile US Press, Everlaw scores higher on our published basis.