BrowserStack Test Reporting & Analytics vs Tesults
BrowserStack Test Reporting & Analytics
8.1 #2 in Test Analytics Software
About BrowserStack Test Reporting & Analytics| BrowserStack Test Reporting & Analytics | Tesults | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Free trial | Yes | No |
| Paid from | Free | $19/mo |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | api, Web | Android, api, iOS, Web |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Supported frameworks | WebdriverIO, TestNG, Cypress, Jest, CodeceptJS, CucumberJS, MochaJS, Playwright, Nightwatch.JS, Serenity, JUnit4, JUnit5, NUnit, xUnit, MSTest, Specflow, Behave, Pytest, Robot, Allure Report Upload, JUnit XML Report Upload | EXP, GoogleTest, Rust #[test], nextest, rstest, JUnit 5, JUnit 4, TestNG, pytest, Robot Framework, NUnit 3, xUnit, MSTest, RSpec, Mocha, Jasmine, Jest, Playwright, WebdriverIO, CodeceptJS, Nightwatch, Vitest, Waffle, Postman, Protractor, Cypress, TestCafe, XCTest, Espresso, Selenium, ROS 2, colcon |
| CI/CD integrations | Jenkins, Azure Pipelines, GitHub Actions, GitLab, CircleCI | GitHub Actions |
| Flaky-test detection | Yes | Yes |
| Failure analysis | Yes | Yes |
| Execution trend reports | Yes | Yes |
| Data retention | 60 days | 90 days |
Both are listed in Best Test Analytics Software. On Samsung Mobile US Press, BrowserStack Test Reporting & Analytics scores higher on our published basis.