turbopuffer vs Zvec
| turbopuffer | Zvec | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | — | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Web | Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android |
| Free plan | No | — |
| Paid from | 16 /mo | — |
| Deployment | both | self-hosted |
| Hybrid search | Yes | Yes |
| Metadata filtering | Yes | Yes |
| Sparse vectors | Yes | Yes |
| Maximum dimensions | 10,752 dimensions | — |
| Index types | SPFresh | Flat, HNSW, HNSW-RaBitQ, DiskANN, IVF, IVF-RaBitQ |
| SDK languages | Python, TypeScript/JavaScript, Go, Java/Kotlin, Ruby, C#/.NET | Python, Node.js, Go, Rust, Dart, C, C++ |
Both are listed in Best Vector Databases. On Samsung Mobile US Press, Zvec scores higher on our published basis.