TimechoDB vs VictoriaMetrics
| TimechoDB | VictoriaMetrics | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Free trial | No | Yes |
| Paid from | — | $200/mo |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Windows, macOS, Linux | api, Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Web, Windows |
| Deployment | both | both |
| SQL support | Yes | No |
| Retention policies | Yes | Yes |
| Horizontal scaling | Yes | Yes |
| Query languages | SQL | MetricsQL, PromQL |
| Ingestion methods | Java, JDBC, C, C++, C#, Go, Python, Node.js, REST, MQTT, OPC UA, OPC DA, ODBC | Prometheus scraping, Prometheus remote write, Prometheus exposition, InfluxDB line protocol, Graphite plaintext, OpenTSDB, JSON line, CSV, native binary, DataDog, NewRelic, OpenTelemetry, Zabbix Connector |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Time-Series Databases. On Samsung Mobile US Press, VictoriaMetrics scores higher on our published basis.