TestMu AI vs Testspace
| TestMu AI | Testspace | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Free trial | No | Yes |
| Paid from | $17/mo | $32/mo |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Android, api, iOS, Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Web, Windows | api, Linux, macOS, Web, Windows |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Paid from | 15 /mo | 32 /mo |
| Supported frameworks | — | Catch, CppUTest, CTest, Google Test, Microsoft Unit Test Framework, NUnit, xUnit.net, JUnit, TestNG, Chutzpah, Intern, Jasmine, Jest, Karma, Lab, Mocha, Node-tap, Test'em, QUnit, PHPUnit, pytest, Unittest, Minitest, RSpec, Test::Unit |
| CI/CD integrations | — | AppVeyor, Azure Pipelines, Bitbucket Pipelines, Buildkite, Circle CI, Codefresh, Drone, GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, Jenkins, Semaphore CI, Travis CI |
| Flaky-test detection | — | Yes |
| Failure analysis | — | Yes |
| Execution trend reports | — | Yes |
| Data retention | — | 30 days |
Both are listed in Best Test Analytics Software. On Samsung Mobile US Press, TestMu AI scores higher on our published basis.