Sonatype Nexus Repository vs Trivy
Sonatype Nexus Repository
6.4 #4 in Software Composition Analysis Software
About Sonatype Nexus Repository| Sonatype Nexus Repository | Trivy | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Free trial | Yes | No |
| Paid from | $162.50/mo | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | api, Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Web, Windows | Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Windows |
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Supported ecosystems | C++/Conan; Conda; Dart and Flutter/pub; Go/Go Modules; Hugging Face; Java/Maven, Gradle, Ivy; JavaScript/npm, yarn; .NET/NuGet; Objective-C/CocoaPods; PHP/Composer; Python/PyPI, Poetry, pipenv; R/CRAN; RPM/Yum and Fedora EPEL; Ruby/RubyGems and Bundler; Rust/Cargo; Swift/Swift | Ruby, Python, PHP, Node.js, .NET, Java, Go, Rust, C/C++, Elixir, Dart, Swift, Julia, and operating-system packages |
| SBOM generation | Yes | Yes |
| Reachability analysis | Yes | — |
| Pull request scanning | Yes | — |
| Deployment options | hybrid | self_hosted |
Both are listed in Best Software Composition Analysis Software. On Samsung Mobile US Press, Sonatype Nexus Repository scores higher on our published basis.