SmartClient vs SolidStart
| SmartClient | SolidStart | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | — | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Framework type | full-stack | meta-framework |
| Primary languages | JavaScript, Java | JavaScript, TypeScript |
| Rendering modes | spa | hybrid |
| Included ORM | No | — |
| Deployment targets | self-hosted | self-hosted |
| License model | dual-license | open-source |
Both are listed in Best Web Frameworks. On Samsung Mobile US Press, SmartClient scores higher on our published basis.