ScanCode.io vs Xygeni
| ScanCode.io | Xygeni | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Free trial | No | Yes |
| Paid from | — | Free |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Web, Linux, macOS, Windows | api, extension, Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Web, Windows |
| Supported ecosystems | npm, PyPI, Maven, NuGet, RubyGems, Cargo, Composer, Conda, Docker; Java, Scala, Kotlin, Groovy, Clojure, JavaScript, TypeScript, Go, Rust, Python, Debian | Maven, Gradle, npm, Yarn, Bower, .NET, Go, Python/Pip, PHP/Composer, Ruby, Dart/Flutter |
| SBOM generation | Yes | Yes |
| Pull request scanning | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment options | self_hosted | hybrid |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Reachability analysis | — | Yes |
| Monitored projects | — | 100 projects |
Both are listed in Best Software Composition Analysis Software. On Samsung Mobile US Press, Xygeni scores higher on our published basis.