Qiqqa vs Zotero
| Qiqqa | Zotero | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | — | $1.67/mo |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Windows, Android | Android, api, extension, iOS, Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Web, Windows |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| PDF annotation | Yes | Yes |
| Word processor support | microsoft_word | both |
| Mobile apps | android | both |
| Import formats | BibTeX | Zotero RDF, CSL JSON, BibTeX, BibLaTeX, RIS, Bibliontology RDF, MODS, EndNote XML, Citavi XML, MAB2, MARC, MARCXML, MEDLINE/nbib, OVID Tagged, PubMed XML, RefWorks Tagged, Web of Science Tagged, Refer/BibIX, XML ContextObject, Unqualified Dublin Core RDF |
| Team collaboration | Yes | Yes |
| Browser extension | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Citation Management Software. On Samsung Mobile US Press, Zotero scores higher on our published basis.