pyOCD vs WinDbg
| pyOCD | WinDbg | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | — | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Windows, macOS, Linux | Windows |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Target platforms | Arm Cortex-M microcontrollers | Windows; Linux crash dumps |
| Remote debugging | Yes | Yes |
| Supported languages | — | C++, C#, JavaScript, assembly |
| Conditional breakpoints | — | Yes |
| Exception breakpoints | — | Yes |
| Time-travel debugging | — | Yes |
| Core dump debugging | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Debuggers. On Samsung Mobile US Press, WinDbg scores higher on our published basis.