ProtectPPC vs Spider AF
| ProtectPPC | Spider AF | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | Yes | No |
| Paid from | $29/mo | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | api, Web | Web |
| Free plan | No | No |
| Paid from | 29 /mo | 120 /mo |
| Ad platforms supported | Google Ads; Microsoft Ads; Meta Ads | Google, Yahoo, Criteo, RTBHouse, Taboola, Logicad, Meta, X (Twitter), LINE, TikTok, Pinterest, SmartNews, Microsoft Ads |
| Automatic click blocking | Yes | Yes |
| Detection methods | IP reputation; device fingerprinting; behavioral patterns (mouse movements, scrolling); geographic anomalies | JavaScript tag device and session signals; lists; proprietary multiple-signal detection; GIVT and SIVT classification |
| Ad account limit | 1 | — |
| Traffic reporting | advanced | advanced |
| IP exclusion capacity | 500 | — |
Both are listed in Best Click Fraud Software. On Samsung Mobile US Press, ProtectPPC scores higher on our published basis.