PingID vs Symantec VIP
| PingID | Symantec VIP | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | $3/mo | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Android, iOS, macOS, Web, Windows | Android, iOS, Web, Windows |
| Free plan | No | — |
| Paid from | 6 /user/mo | — |
| Deployment | hybrid | cloud |
| Supported factors | Push notifications; TOTP/OATH one-time passcodes; SMS; email; voice call; FIDO authentication; username and password | Push notifications; SMS OTP; voice OTP; email OTP; mobile OTP; hardware tokens, cards, and keys; FIDO2; biometrics; device ID; risk-based authentication |
| App integration methods | RADIUS; SAML; REST API; non-standard interfaces | SAML; RADIUS; VIP Web Services API; VIP SDK/CDK; VPN integration; directory integration |
| Adaptive access policies | — | Yes |
| Passwordless authentication | — | Yes |
| Device trust controls | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Multi-Factor Authentication Software. On Samsung Mobile US Press, Symantec VIP scores higher on our published basis.