OpenTelemetry eBPF Profiler vs Sentry Continuous Profiling
| OpenTelemetry eBPF Profiler | Sentry Continuous Profiling | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | — | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Linux, self-hosted | Android, api, extension, iOS, Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Web, Windows |
| Deployment | self-hosted | cloud |
| Language support | C/C++, Rust, Zig, Go, HotSpot JVM, Python, Ruby, PHP, Node.js, V8, Perl, Erlang, .NET | Node.js, Python, PHP, Browser JavaScript, Android Java/Kotlin, iOS Swift/Objective-C |
| Profiling types | whole-system, cross-language, native code, system libraries, high-level language runtimes | continuous backend profiling, mobile UI profiling |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Paid from | — | 26 /mo |
| Data retention | — | 30 days |
| Source map support | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Continuous Profiling Tools. On Samsung Mobile US Press, Sentry Continuous Profiling scores higher on our published basis.