OpenAEV vs ShadowBreach
| OpenAEV | ShadowBreach | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Free trial | Yes | No |
| Paid from | Free | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | api, Linux, self-hosted, Web | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Attack simulation modes | hybrid | — |
| Included attack surfaces | endpoints, asset groups, people, teams, network hosts, email, phishing landing pages, SMS, phone-based social engineering, media pressure, tabletop exercises | — |
| MITRE ATT&CK mapping | Yes | — |
| Custom attack scenarios | Yes | — |
| Continuous scheduling | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment model | hybrid | — |
Both are listed in Best Breach and Attack Simulation Software. On Samsung Mobile US Press, OpenAEV scores higher on our published basis.