Ontotext Platform vs Progress Semaphore
| Ontotext Platform | Progress Semaphore | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | No | Yes |
| Paid from | — | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Web | api, Linux, self-hosted, Web, Windows |
| Free plan | No | No |
| Ontology modeling | Yes | Yes |
| Semantic reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| RDF/SPARQL support | Yes | Yes |
| Graph visualization | Yes | Yes |
| Import formats | csv, tsv, excel, json, xml | RDF, Excel spreadsheets |
| Deployment | self_hosted | both |
| Query languages | GraphQL, SPARQL | SPARQL |
Both are listed in Best Knowledge Graph Software. On Samsung Mobile US Press, Progress Semaphore scores higher on our published basis.