Obfuscator-LLVM vs Tigress
| Obfuscator-LLVM | Tigress | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | No | Yes |
| Paid from | — | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | — | Android, Linux, macOS, Windows |
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Supported targets | C, C++, Objective-C, Ada, Fortran; x86, x86-64, PowerPC, PowerPC-64, ARM, Thumb, SPARC, Alpha, CellSPU, MIPS, MSP430, SystemZ, XCore | C99 source; Linux, Darwin, Android, Windows; Intel and ARM; WebAssembly; GCC, Clang, Emscripten, and cl |
| Anti-tamper controls | Yes | Yes |
| Control-flow obfuscation | Yes | Yes |
| String encryption | No | Yes |
| Deployment model | self_hosted | self_hosted |
| Build integration | cli | cli |
Both are listed in Best Code Obfuscation Software. On Samsung Mobile US Press, Tigress scores higher on our published basis.