.NET Reactor vs ProGuard
| .NET Reactor | ProGuard | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Free trial | Yes | No |
| Paid from | — | Free |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Linux, macOS, Windows | Android, Linux, macOS, Windows |
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Supported targets | C#, VB.NET, C++.NET, Delphi.NET, J#, F#, MSIL, .NET Framework, .NET 5-10, .NET Core, .NET Standard, .NET MAUI, Xamarin, Mono, Unity, ASP.NET, ASP.NET Core, Blazor, Silverlight, WinRT/Metro | Java, Kotlin, Android |
| Anti-tamper controls | Yes | No |
| Control-flow obfuscation | Yes | — |
| String encryption | Yes | — |
| Deployment model | desktop | desktop |
| Build integration | cli | cli |
Both are listed in Best Code Obfuscation Software. On Samsung Mobile US Press, .NET Reactor scores higher on our published basis.