NanoMQ vs SocketCluster
| NanoMQ | SocketCluster | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | — | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Windows, Linux | Web, Android, iOS |
| Deployment model | self_hosted | self_hosted |
| Delivery guarantees | configurable | — |
| Supported protocols | MQTT, ZeroMQ, nanomsg, NNG, WebSocket, SOME/IP, DDS, MQTT over QUIC | HTTP, WebSocket |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Ordering guarantees | — | per_queue |
Both are listed in Best Message Broker Software. On Samsung Mobile US Press, SocketCluster scores higher on our published basis.