MX Linux vs Ubuntu Touch
| MX Linux | Ubuntu Touch | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | Free | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Linux | Android |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Device types | Desktop and laptop computers; removable USB media for live operation | Phones, tablets, desktop PCs, Raspberry Pi, Pinebook |
| CPU architectures | 64-bit only for MX-25 official releases | — |
| Support lifecycle | Major versions follow Debian Stable releases; support duration varies by release (official chart linked in FAQ, but not verified here). | Regular OTA updates; no fixed support duration stated |
| Built-in management | MX Tools; MX Updater with package update checks, upgrade modes and scheduled unattended upgrades; MX Package Installer | OTA system updates; device installation via UBports Installer |
| App compatibility | Debian packages and repositories, Debian Backports, Flatpak, Snap on supported setups, AppImage | OpenStore native apps; Waydroid Android apps; Libertine desktop Linux apps |
| Deployment models | Install on physical computers; live system from USB; customized live/remastered images | Install on compatible physical devices; preinstalled devices; virtual development installation |
Both are listed in Best Operating Systems. On Samsung Mobile US Press, Ubuntu Touch scores higher on our published basis.