MozJPEG vs Tarpaulin
| MozJPEG | Tarpaulin | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | Free | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | api, Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Windows | Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Windows |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Coverage types | line, branch, function | line |
| Supported languages | Rust, C, C++, JavaScript, Go, Java, Kotlin | Rust |
| Report formats | LCOV, Coveralls, Coveralls+, covdir JSON, ActiveData-ETL, files, Markdown, HTML, Cobertura XML | JSON, stdout, XML, HTML, LCOV |
| Pull-request annotations | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hosted option | — | Yes |
| Historical trends | — | Yes |
| Coverage gates | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Test Coverage Tools. On Samsung Mobile US Press, MozJPEG scores higher on our published basis.