MozJPEG vs SimpleCov
| MozJPEG | SimpleCov | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | — | Free |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | api | Linux, macOS, Web, Windows |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Coverage types | line, branch, function | line, branch, method, oneshot-line, eval |
| Supported languages | Rust, C, C++, JavaScript, Go, Java, Kotlin | Ruby |
| Report formats | LCOV, Coveralls, Coveralls+, covdir JSON, ActiveData-ETL, files, Markdown, HTML, Cobertura XML | HTML, JSON |
| Pull-request annotations | Yes | — |
| Historical trends | — | Yes |
| Coverage gates | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Test Coverage Tools. On Samsung Mobile US Press, MozJPEG scores higher on our published basis.