MozJPEG vs NCover
| MozJPEG | NCover | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | Free | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | api, Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Windows | Windows |
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Coverage types | line, branch, function | sequence point, branch, method, condition, symbol, line, cyclomatic complexity |
| Supported languages | Rust, C, C++, JavaScript, Go, Java, Kotlin | C#, VB.NET, C++/CLI, other .NET CLI languages |
| Report formats | LCOV, Coveralls, Coveralls+, covdir JSON, ActiveData-ETL, files, Markdown, HTML, Cobertura XML | HTML, XML, JSON, CSV, NCover v3 XML |
| Pull-request annotations | Yes | — |
| Self-hosted option | — | Yes |
| Historical trends | — | Yes |
| Coverage gates | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Test Coverage Tools. On Samsung Mobile US Press, MozJPEG scores higher on our published basis.