Microsoft Code Coverage vs MozJPEG
| Microsoft Code Coverage | MozJPEG | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | Free | Free |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Linux, macOS, Windows | api, Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Windows |
| Coverage types | line, block, assembly, class, procedure, managed CLR, unmanaged native | line, branch, function |
| Supported languages | C#, C++ | Rust, C, C++, JavaScript, Go, Java, Kotlin |
| Report formats | coverage, XML, Cobertura | LCOV, Coveralls, Coveralls+, covdir JSON, ActiveData-ETL, files, Markdown, HTML, Cobertura XML |
| Coverage gates | Yes | — |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Pull-request annotations | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Test Coverage Tools. On Samsung Mobile US Press, Microsoft Code Coverage scores higher on our published basis.