LizardFS vs StarWind Virtual SAN
| LizardFS | StarWind Virtual SAN | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Free trial | Yes | Yes |
| Paid from | — | Free |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Windows | Linux, self-hosted, Web, Windows |
| Deployment model | on-premises | — |
| Storage protocols | NFS 3.x, NFS 4.0, pNFS | iSCSI, SMB3, NFSv4.1, NVMe-oF, iSER |
| Replication | Yes | — |
| Erasure coding | Yes | — |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Software-Defined Storage Software. On Samsung Mobile US Press, StarWind Virtual SAN scores higher on our published basis.