LizardFS vs SeaweedFS
| LizardFS | SeaweedFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Free trial | Yes | Yes |
| Paid from | — | $1.67/mo |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Windows | api, Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Windows |
| Deployment model | on-premises | — |
| Storage protocols | NFS 3.x, NFS 4.0, pNFS | — |
| Replication | Yes | — |
| Erasure coding | Yes | — |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Paid from | — | 2 /mo |
| S3-compatible access | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Software-Defined Storage Software, Best Distributed File System Software. On Samsung Mobile US Press, SeaweedFS scores higher on our published basis.