LizardFS vs MooseFS
| LizardFS | MooseFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Free trial | Yes | No |
| Paid from | — | Free |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Windows | api, Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Web, Windows |
| Deployment model | on-premises | on-premises |
| Storage protocols | NFS 3.x, NFS 4.0, pNFS | POSIX filesystem; block device; C API |
| Replication | Yes | Yes |
| Erasure coding | Yes | Yes |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Kubernetes support | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Software-Defined Storage Software, Best Distributed File System Software. On Samsung Mobile US Press, MooseFS scores higher on our published basis.