LiveEnsure vs OneSpan Cloud Authentication
| LiveEnsure | OneSpan Cloud Authentication | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | — | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Android, api, iOS, Web |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | cloud | cloud |
| Supported factors | mobile device, location, geofence, time, knowledge, biometrics, behavior, gestures, Bluetooth devices, QR scan, tap, challenge/OTP | static password; offline OTP; secure channel; push notification; FIDO UAF; FIDO2; hardware authenticators; mobile authenticators; Cronto image authentication; biometric device authentication |
| App integration methods | REST/API integration, iOS library, Android library, QR scan, app-to-app handoff | REST API; web application integration; Android and iOS Orchestration SDK; Mobile Authenticator Studio; push notification integration |
| Passwordless authentication | Yes | Yes |
| Device trust controls | Yes | Yes |
| Adaptive access policies | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Multi-Factor Authentication Software. On Samsung Mobile US Press, OneSpan Cloud Authentication scores higher on our published basis.