LinOTP vs PingID
| LinOTP | PingID | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Free trial | Yes | No |
| Paid from | Free | $3/mo |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Android, api, iOS, Linux, self-hosted, Web, Windows | Android, iOS, macOS, Web, Windows |
| Deployment | hybrid | hybrid |
| Supported factors | HOTP, TOTP, mOTP, OCRA, SMS OTP, email OTP, push, QR, YubiKey, FIDO U2F, RADIUS, remote, forwarding, static password, daily password | Push notifications; TOTP/OATH one-time passcodes; SMS; email; voice call; FIDO authentication; username and password |
| App integration methods | HTTP/JSON API, PAM, RADIUS, SAML, OpenVPN, SSH, Apache, WordPress | RADIUS; SAML; REST API; non-standard interfaces |
| Free plan | — | No |
| Paid from | — | 6 /user/mo |
Both are listed in Best Multi-Factor Authentication Software. On Samsung Mobile US Press, LinOTP scores higher on our published basis.