LCOV vs Tarpaulin
| LCOV | Tarpaulin | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | Free | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Linux, self-hosted | Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Windows |
| Coverage types | line, function, branch, MC/DC | line |
| Supported languages | C/C++, Perl, Python | Rust |
| Report formats | LCOV .info tracefiles, HTML | JSON, stdout, XML, HTML, LCOV |
| Self-hosted option | Yes | Yes |
| Historical trends | Yes | Yes |
| Coverage gates | Yes | Yes |
| Pull-request annotations | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Test Coverage Tools. On Samsung Mobile US Press, LCOV scores higher on our published basis.