Kuma vs Solo Enterprise for Istio
| Kuma | Solo Enterprise for Istio | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | Free | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | api, Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Web | self-hosted |
| Deployment model | self_hosted | self_hosted |
| Proxy architecture | sidecar | both |
| mTLS support | Yes | Yes |
| Traffic policies | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-cluster support | Yes | Yes |
| Supported platforms | Kubernetes, OpenShift, Universal (VMs), bare metal | Kubernetes, OpenShift, Amazon EKS, Google GKE, Azure AKS, kind, k3d, k3s, MicroK8s, Minikube |
| Free plan | — | No |
Both are listed in Best Service Mesh Platforms. On Samsung Mobile US Press, Kuma scores higher on our published basis.