KubeStellar vs Open Cluster Management
| KubeStellar | Open Cluster Management | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | — | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Web | api, extension, Linux, self-hosted |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Control plane management | both | customer-managed |
| Supported environments | cloud; on-premises; hybrid; edge; kind; k3s; OpenShift | Kubernetes clusters on cloud providers including GKE, EKS, and AKS; local kind clusters; on-premises environments |
| Cluster provisioning | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-cluster management | Yes | Yes |
| Policy enforcement | Yes | Yes |
| Upgrade management | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Kubernetes Management Platforms. On Samsung Mobile US Press, Open Cluster Management scores higher on our published basis.