Kong Gateway vs Lura
| Kong Gateway | Lura | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Free trial | Yes | No |
| Paid from | Free | Free |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | api, Linux, self-hosted, Web | api, self-hosted |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment model | hybrid | self-hosted |
| Supported protocols | REST, HTTP, Kafka, WebSockets, gRPC, GraphQL, UDP, TCP, TLS | HTTP(S); other transport adapters can be added, including Thrift, gRPC, AMQP and NATS |
| Authentication methods | Basic Auth, HMAC, JWT, Key Auth, LDAP, mutual TLS, OAuth 2.0, OpenID Connect, SAML, Vault | — |
| Rate limiting | Yes | — |
| Request transformation | Yes | Yes |
| Monthly request limit | 1,000,000 requests/mo | — |
Both are listed in Best API Gateway Software. On Samsung Mobile US Press, Kong Gateway scores higher on our published basis.