JuiceFS vs SeaweedFS
| JuiceFS | SeaweedFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Free trial | Yes | Yes |
| Paid from | Free | $1.67/mo |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | api, Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Windows | api, Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Windows |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Paid from | 0.02 /mo | 2 /mo |
| Deployment model | hybrid | — |
| Storage protocols | POSIX, HDFS, S3, WebDAV | — |
| Replication | Yes | — |
| Erasure coding | No | — |
| Kubernetes support | Yes | — |
| S3-compatible access | Yes | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Software-Defined Storage Software, Best Distributed File System Software. On Samsung Mobile US Press, SeaweedFS scores higher on our published basis.