Infortrend EonCloud Gateway vs NetApp Global File Cache
Infortrend EonCloud Gateway
5.2 #20 in Cloud Storage Gateway Software
About Infortrend EonCloud Gateway| Infortrend EonCloud Gateway | NetApp Global File Cache | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | Yes | No |
| Paid from | — | $20.83/mo |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | self-hosted | Linux, self-hosted, Windows |
| Free plan | No | — |
| Deployment model | hybrid | virtual |
| Local caching | Yes | Yes |
| Supported protocols | NFS, CIFS, FTP, Rsync, Fibre Channel, iSCSI | SMB/CIFS |
| Cloud storage targets | Amazon S3, Microsoft Azure, Alibaba Cloud, Google Cloud, OpenStack, Baidu Cloud, Tencent Cloud, Wasabi, Yandex Object Storage, hiCloud, HCP, Backblaze Cloud | Azure NetApp Files; Cloud Volumes ONTAP; Cloud Volume Services |
| Edge synchronization | Yes | — |
| Global namespace | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Cloud Storage Gateway Software. On Samsung Mobile US Press, NetApp Global File Cache scores higher on our published basis.