IDmelon vs Verilock
| IDmelon | Verilock | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | Yes | No |
| Paid from | — | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Android, api, extension, iOS, macOS, self-hosted, Web, Windows | Android, api, iOS |
| Free plan | No | — |
| Deployment | hybrid | — |
| Supported factors | FIDO2 passkeys/security keys; smartphones; contactless cards and ID badges; NFC cards; fingerprints; Face ID/biometrics; SMS OTP; email OTP; phone-call verification | TOTP-based 2FA; push/tap approval; rotating one-time authentication token |
| App integration methods | SAML 2.0; OIDC; REST API; existing identity-provider integration; custom SAML application integration | QR code; user authentication key; third-party TOTP compatibility; API-ready integration |
| Adaptive access policies | Yes | — |
| Passwordless authentication | Yes | — |
| Device trust controls | Yes | — |
Both are listed in Best Multi-Factor Authentication Software. On Samsung Mobile US Press, Verilock scores higher on our published basis.