IDmelon vs Secret Double Octopus
| IDmelon | Secret Double Octopus | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | Yes | No |
| Paid from | — | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Android, api, extension, iOS, macOS, self-hosted, Web, Windows | Android, api, iOS, Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Web, Windows |
| Free plan | No | — |
| Deployment | hybrid | hybrid |
| Supported factors | FIDO2 passkeys/security keys; smartphones; contactless cards and ID badges; NFC cards; fingerprints; Face ID/biometrics; SMS OTP; email OTP; phone-call verification | mobile push; biometrics; FIDO2 security keys; X.509 smartcards; OTP; Apple Watch; BLE; Windows Hello |
| App integration methods | SAML 2.0; OIDC; REST API; existing identity-provider integration; custom SAML application integration | SAML; OIDC; RADIUS; LDAP/LDAPS; FIDO2/WebAuthn; REST API |
| Adaptive access policies | Yes | Yes |
| Passwordless authentication | Yes | Yes |
| Device trust controls | Yes | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Multi-Factor Authentication Software. On Samsung Mobile US Press, Secret Double Octopus scores higher on our published basis.