HyperExecute vs Trunk Flaky Tests
| HyperExecute | Trunk Flaky Tests | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Free trial | Yes | Yes |
| Paid from | $103,129/mo | Free |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | api, Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Web, Windows | self-hosted, Web |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Flake detection | Yes | — |
| Quarantine workflow | Yes | — |
| Failure clustering | Yes | — |
| Rerun policies | Yes | — |
| Supported frameworks | Selenium, Playwright, Puppeteer, Cypress, Appium, Espresso, Maestro, XCUI, TestNG, JUnit, Cucumber, WebdriverIO, Protractor, Nightwatch, BiDi, NUnit, SpecFlow, PyUnit, PyTest, Robot, Behave, Ruby, Capybara, Jest, Mocha, CodeceptJs, JMeter, Gatling | Android, Bazel, Behave, cargo-nextest, Cypress, Dart Test, Go, GoogleTest, Gradle, Jasmine, Karma, Kotest, Maven, minitest, Mocha, Nightwatch, NUnit, Pest, PHPUnit, Playwright, Pytest, Robot Framework, RSpec, Swift Testing, Testplan, Vitest, XCTest |
| Issue tracker links | Yes | — |
Both are listed in Best Test Flakiness Management Software. On Samsung Mobile US Press, HyperExecute scores higher on our published basis.