HCL AppScan vs OpenText Fortify on Demand
OpenText Fortify on Demand
6.1 #8 in Interactive Application Security Testing Software
About OpenText Fortify on Demand| HCL AppScan | OpenText Fortify on Demand | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Free trial | Yes | No |
| Paid from | Free | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | api, extension, Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Web, Windows | Web |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Runtime targets | all | web |
| Deployment | hybrid | saas |
| Authenticated testing | Yes | Yes |
| API testing | Yes | Yes |
| Instrumentation | agent | agent |
| CI/CD integration | Yes | Yes |
| Language coverage | Java, .NET, Node.js, PHP, Python; frameworks include Spring, Express, Flask, and FastAPI | Java, .NET |
Both are listed in Best Interactive Application Security Testing Software. On Samsung Mobile US Press, HCL AppScan scores higher on our published basis.