Greymatter vs Kuma
| Greymatter | Kuma | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Free trial | Yes | No |
| Paid from | — | Free |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | api, self-hosted | api, Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Web |
| Free plan | No | — |
| Deployment model | hybrid | self_hosted |
| Proxy architecture | both | sidecar |
| mTLS support | Yes | Yes |
| Traffic policies | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-cluster support | Yes | Yes |
| Supported platforms | Kubernetes | Kubernetes, OpenShift, Universal (VMs), bare metal |
Both are listed in Best Service Mesh Platforms. On Samsung Mobile US Press, Kuma scores higher on our published basis.