GreptimeDB vs TimechoDB
| GreptimeDB | TimechoDB | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | $290/mo | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Android, api, Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Web, Windows | Windows, macOS, Linux |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Paid from | 290 /mo | — |
| Deployment | both | both |
| SQL support | Yes | Yes |
| Retention policies | Yes | Yes |
| Horizontal scaling | Yes | Yes |
| Query languages | SQL, PromQL, Log Query | SQL |
| Ingestion methods | Prometheus Remote Write, OpenTelemetry OTLP/HTTP, Loki Push API, Elasticsearch Bulk API, InfluxDB Line Protocol, MySQL, PostgreSQL, gRPC, HTTP | Java, JDBC, C, C++, C#, Go, Python, Node.js, REST, MQTT, OPC UA, OPC DA, ODBC |
Both are listed in Best Time-Series Databases. On Samsung Mobile US Press, GreptimeDB scores higher on our published basis.