Gnocchi vs GreptimeDB
| Gnocchi | GreptimeDB | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | — | $290/mo |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | — | Android, api, Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Web, Windows |
| Deployment | self_hosted | both |
| SQL support | No | Yes |
| Retention policies | Yes | Yes |
| Horizontal scaling | Yes | Yes |
| Query languages | REST API | SQL, PromQL, Log Query |
| Ingestion methods | HTTP REST API; StatsD; Prometheus Remote Write; InfluxDB line protocol; AMQP 1.0; collectd | Prometheus Remote Write, OpenTelemetry OTLP/HTTP, Loki Push API, Elasticsearch Bulk API, InfluxDB Line Protocol, MySQL, PostgreSQL, gRPC, HTTP |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Paid from | — | 290 /mo |
Both are listed in Best Time-Series Databases. On Samsung Mobile US Press, GreptimeDB scores higher on our published basis.