Gluster vs NetApp ONTAP Select
| Gluster | NetApp ONTAP Select | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | Free | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Linux, self-hosted | — |
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Deployment model | hybrid | on-premises |
| Storage protocols | Native GlusterFS, NFS, SMB/CIFS, iSCSI, Swift REST API | NFS, SMB/CIFS, iSCSI, NVMe over TCP, S3 |
| Replication | Yes | Yes |
| Erasure coding | Yes | — |
| Maximum nodes | — | 12 |
| Kubernetes support | — | Yes |
| S3-compatible access | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Software-Defined Storage Software. On Samsung Mobile US Press, Gluster scores higher on our published basis.